The Michael Teachings [dot] NET Learning How To Choose, and Choosing How To Learn

1Mar/100

Michael Speaks: On Love

Reading time: 9 - 15 minutes

Michael Speaks
021410
[full transcript]

[~MEntity] Hello to all of you. We are here now. We understand the subject for discussion is our perspective on Love as defined by what some call "Levels," others call "degrees," though we think the word "rings" carries a more accurate visual for how these manifest in your life. We also know that we have already provided text documentation of this topic that can be referred to as part of this discussion. [transcript for 7 Rings of Love]

What we will do here, then, is synopsize our perception, so as to make more time for your questions. In that synopsis, however, we will emphasize and elaborate upon key considerations that we feel may be meaningful.

We would first want to emphasize that your Universe, in all of its variations and parallels and dimensions and physical space and distance, internally and externally, is ALREADY LOVE, ALREADY LOVED, and ALREADY LOVING. There is no way around that Universal Truth.

Love is an independent state, quality, action, etc that is not affected by any beliefs, time, distance, feelings, plane, etc. LOVE simply IS.

We would define Love as NON-ATTACHMENT. This is often described as "unconditional," as there are no conditions where Love is not present, no conditions under which Love is not accessible, no symptoms upon which its presence is dependent. When we define Love as Non-Attachment, we mean that its existence is not contained or limited by any symptom, shape, or expectation.
We also mean that Love is INCLUSIVE, so that no state, no feeling, no action, no expectation that can be conceived is not a PART of Love. To help you in imagining exactly what Love is as a Universal Truth, shift this concept to the idea of Energy as it exists among you.

Energy comes in all shapes, dimensions, and times, and it exists not just within all of those things, but those things exist within it. In the same way that you could travel to another star system and find Energy as a matter of fact, so would you find Love, regardless of what it is called, or how it is perceived and shared or rejected.

Because the concept of Love and all of its ramifications has either become so "cliche," or so attached to symbols and symptoms, we think it is important to emphasize the fact that Love exists, not just in those instances, but beyond those in a way that is far more abundant when acknowledged.

When the fact and existence of Love is acknowledged and embraced within one's life, it is no less-powerful than acknowledging and embracing the impact of your Truths, and your Energy.

Embracing and acknowledging your Truths simply means to bring a conscious awareness to the fact that your experiences are dictated by your interpretations, and to then take responsibility for those interpretations.

Embracing and acknowledging your Energy simply means to bring a conscious awareness to the fact that your actions, reactions, decisions, and choices are the primary creators of your life, and to then take responsibility for those actions, reactions, decisions, and choices.

Embracing and acknowledging your Love simply means to bring a conscious awareness to the fact that YOU ARE ULTIMATELY SAFE, and then to take responsibility for appropriately enlisting protection as necessary, instead of at every turn. There is no more immediate way for you to call on the power of Love than to still yourself with the reminder that YOU ARE ULTIMATELY SAFE.
We have said that Truth is the Greatest Good (energy), and that Love is the Highest Truth. We say this for several reasons. One of those reasons is to reflect the fact that calling upon the power of Love automatically pulls in the higher values of Truth and Energy. This pattern will always be the same: Energy is shaped from Truth is shaped from Love :: Love aligns all of these.

One can take responsibility for the power of Truth, which immediately aligns one's power of Energy, but still not experience the validity of Love. One can take responsibility for the power of Energy and learn how to choose, and choose how to learn, but still remain lost against Truth and Love.

However, combining the process so that one leads to the next, leads to Love. OR calling upon the power of Love immediately includes the previous processes. In other words, when you know you are safe, you are able to make better choices, and more clearly utilize your truths. In addition to this, once you have embraced your safety on such a profound level, it immediately drops the useless, outdated, and unnecessarily protective truths and choices/energies.

Making this statement of safety helps one to validate exactly what threats there may very well be, and then to respond to those more effectively, and it helps one to see where the lies are being told to oneself about the threats in life that are merely echos of pain, confusion, longings, etc. and then to tend to those more effectively. When one makes the statement I AM ULTIMATELY SAFE, if there is a consciousness brought to that statement, one should feel the body immediately relax, the mind to slow, the forehead, face, jaw, back, torso, shoulders, feet, hands, tongue, etc. all fall into a simple presence.
The Physical Plane is a plane filled with threats to the body and experiences can and do harm ones psyche and other subtle bodies, but the greatest threat to older soul that causes the greatest debilitation and scathing is the constant sense of lacking safety. When we speak of Safety here, we speak to the fact that in most instances, there are no immediate threats to warrant your fear, and certainly not to warrant your rejection of Love. We also speak to the fact that every worst-case scenario is death, and even then, you are ultimately safe.

Growing older in soul age does not mean you grow weary of the Physical Plane, as most have presumed is the case for the Old Soul, but instead you grow attached to the Physical Plane and to your creation of more and more refined Personalities that you nurture so lovingly. You being to "love this place." So when we speak of your Safety, and you state that you are ultimately safe, you are speaking on behalf of both Personality and Essence. The irony in the increased attachment to the Physical Plane and to the various Personalities is that the blows to your attachment is what leads to that final lifetime wherein it is grasped that you can truly Love and be Loved in a way that has expanded absolutely beyond attachment to any symbol, shape, or symptom. And from that perspective, it is a profound realization that nothing was, or ever will be, lost.

We have much to say on the subject of Love, of course, and our time is limited through this channel in this format at this time, so we will open the floor now to your questions, if you have any, and leave the synopsis to be included in the final transcript.

* ~MEntity OPENS THE FLOOR

[Student] Greetings Michael. I have a question about terminology. What you term Love has been called different things in different philosophies, surely. What are these names? What would it be called in Alchemy, Kabbala, Chinese Taoism or the Gurdjieff system? And why do you see Love as the preferred term (if you do)? Thank you.

[~MEntity] Regardless of language or terminology or teaching, we would say that this state by any name would be one of RESONANCE, EQUIVALENCE, AFFECTION, etc. We do not have a preferrence, though we do see the word "Love" as being more capable of embracing all of the variations, as opposed to a more specific word. In Alchemy and Kabbala, "Love" is often represented in phrases described by "Laws," whereas in Taoism and Gurdjieff, "Love" is represented by parables and pondering.

[Student] It seems to me that the word "acceptance" comes very close to Love, while lacking its more sentimental qualities.

[~MEntity] The reason we refer to Resonance, Equivalence, and Affection is because they hint at the ultimate state of Love, which is not only inclusive and embracing, but capable of adapting to, or altering, the frequency of that which is Loved. Acceptance is a word we've chosen to represent the highest capabilities of the Personality for manifesting Love. Striving for Agape (affection), the positive pole, moves one toward manifestation of Essence, which is the only aspect of "you" that can truly Love.

[Student] Re. Gurdjieff, I was thinking of the Affirming, Denying and Neutralizing forces.

[~MEntity] The Personality is incapable of truly Loving (complete non-attachment), and it is painful and cruel to pretend that it is possible; however, when Essence is present, which can happen in a single moment of safety, then Love is capable of being present. We can comment on Gurdjieff's interpretation of our teaching and the process of Love at another time as that would be an elaboration that this allotted time frame does not allow.

[Student] Thank you Michael for the teachings today. Through my few experiences in this incarnation with relationships, whether it be colleagues, friends, close friends or failed attempts at intimate relationships, I have found myself at the end of those relationships feeling guilty and shameful for having allowed myself to love another person, often due to my own causes for the various failures of the relationship. How do I begin to correct this so that I no longer fear love or fall in love with being in love, so to speak? Thanks you.

[~MEntity] The most powerful means we know of for bringing Love to a relationship, before, during, and after, is to bring into your awareness the state of PERMISSION. We use this word to describe the act of acknowledging all of the dirty, shameful, guilty levels of your experience, allowing yourself to process these, while embracing the fact that Love has plenty of room for all of that. That would be the initial starting point for transforming those energies; the Permission to experience them.
[Student] I don't quite understand what you mean, could you elaborate?[Student] How do I experience them without becoming completely absorbed by them?

[~MEntity] They are YOUR experiences. They are YOUR choices. They are YOUR defenses. You implemented them for a reason and that is reason enough. You do not have to justify them, nor do you have to make sense of them. You simply encourage yourself to allow room for those interpretations of your experiences. In the act of giving yourself permission to feel the way you feel, to interpret life the way you choose to at the moment, you then make room for other possibilities.
[Student] The few times I have allowed myself to feel those emotions often lead to large set-backs in life, and so to some degree from those, I fear them.

[~MEntity] The more you resist, shame, reject, and fear what these interpretations are, or what they may mean, the more you become addicted to them in a way that then becomes preemptive. We would say say that if it is true that you allowed yourself to embrace those interpretations, then either those "setbacks" were a part of the process of opportunity for you to transform your experiences. Otherwise, the setbacks were an extension of your resistance to the interpretations. What we mean by "permission," is not the same thing as "indulgence."

[Student] could you explain the difference in this sense?

[~MEntity] Permission is not consuming. It is not overwhelming. It is not further indulgence. It is a method for processing.

[Student] By further indulgence, do you mean obsessing?

[~MEntity] In other words, it could be said "I feel this way now, and that is okay, but it is not the truth." FEELINGS are never the truth. They are simply indicators of how you are interpreting the truth. Therefore, to try to make sense of your feelings in way that matches the truth can be a painful and unending process.

[Student] Isn't Love a feeling?

[~MEntity] When we say that Feelings are never the truth, we merely say that feelings are your response to what you have determined is true. Therefore, examining your feelings is only going to give you a pale reflection of the truth.

[Student] So then as my final question on this, how might I dig deeper to see beyond the feelings?

[~MEntity] So when we state that permission is powerful, we are suggesting that you allow your feelings to exist, while making room for the truth beyond those feelings. We realize we have not solved your dilemma, but we must conclude here as we have already run over Troy's allotted time frame for this session.

[~MEntity] Good evening to each of you.
[~MEntity] Goodbye.

11Aug/098

Diet, Awareness, Consciousness, and Soul Age

Reading time: 10 - 16 minutes

Recently I posted from the MichaelEntity twitter account a quote that raised some questions from a couple of students. The quote was:

"one's choice in diet reveals more about the level of consciousness, manifested soul age, and body/mind harmony than any other daily choice"

The reaction from a couple of students was that this "wasn't Michael." With some elaboration, it was explained that "Michael doesn't take such moral stances of judgment." I was very surprised by that reaction because I didn't read or interpret the quote as anything more than Michael's usual, flat statements of information.

The students and I were limited in our exchanges with each other, so I was left to presume that some took this statement from Michael to be some kind of judgmental reflection of some kind of range of hierarchy between the eating of animals versus the abstaining from eating animals. That's the only thing I can think of that would be seen as a "moral stance of judgment."

Now, most of us who have worked with Michael for any length of time will know that any moralistic stance from Michael would be a clear sign that the information was no longer from Michael. I've never heard Michael take a stance on any issues that I am passionate about, nor have I heard Michael take a stance for anyone else's passionate investments. So if a student "hears" in the statement above a moralistic stance supporting vegetarianism, I can understand why they scoffed. But in all the years I have been passionate about animal rights and vegetarian/veganism, I have never found Michael to "side" with my passion about that subject. They see a much bigger picture than I do, and they are able to grasp the nature of life and the universe in a way that is detached, but not apathetic.

A lot of students turn to a passage from one of the early Yarbro books where someone asked about whether there was some kind of spiritual superiority in not eating animals, and Michael basically said, "no." [if you find the quote, please post it in the comments.] Other times, students quote "all is choice" as a way to show that Michael has no statement about whether to eat animals, or not.

The fact is, Michael has never said that either eating animals or not eating animals is one better than the other, and it's true that Michael emphasizes that to eat meat or not eat meat, one way or the other, is our choice. But what some students fail to consider in the full library of information offered by Michael is that they say the same thing about murder, rape, violence, child abuse, war, etc. They don't have any judgments about the superiority of one person who murders or rapes over one who doesn't, and they emphasize that to do any of those things is our choice.

They also clearly describe an evolution of our capacity for compassion and awareness to a degree that makes participation in murder, rape, child abuse, and war less and less appealing and that those acts do not serve us very well in our older Soul Ages. The more aware we are, the more empathy we gain, and the more empathy, the more our capacity for compassion, and the more our capacity for compassion, the less appealing any kind of harmful act.

That evolution of consciousness doesn't mean we can't choose to murder, rape, kill animals, or war, and it doesn't mean that Michael has an opinion about any of these matters.  It just means exactly what Michael says, that evolution of consciousness tends to include an ever-increasing circle of awareness and compassion, and this eventually does extend to species beyond our own.  For a lot of people, that compassion and sensitivity translates into actively making choices that help to alleviate as much pain and suffering as possible for ourselves and other species.  They've also elaborated upon the fact that while there is no "morality" in the higher scheme of things, there is a sort of "cosmic ethics" that is eventually comprehended, which includes the awareness of how our choices affect ourselves and others; otherwise, there wouldn't be any Karma.  They have also commented through channels from the original group to the present channels, that as the soul ages, the move away from animals as a primary resource is a common counterpart to our evolving consciousness.  They don't describe that as any kind of superiority, but as a common side-effect of expanding our capacity to care.

So while the quote I posted doesn't make a judgment, and doesn't speak to vegetarianism or veganism, it does speak to the degree of awareness and compassion we evolve in making our choices of what we eat, and that this eventually expands our concern from just the health of our bodies to the health of our bodies as part of the health of our planet.

Below is the original transcript from where I pulled the quote.  As you will see, there's no mention of what to eat, just a map of how we eat, and that this can reflect where we are in our level of consciousness and health.

Question: "Michael, you have said that we have to sort of regain our consciousness in every lifetime since it's always a new body that has to adapt to our Essence, and that even if we are an Old Soul, we have to work through each Soul Age as part of growing up. That's why we have a 'manifested soul age' and our 'technical soul age." Are there tell-tale ways we can see where we are in our personal level of awareness and return to manifesting our true Soul Age?"

MICHAEL:
We would first clarify that a Body, or Personality, does not have to do anything more than live, if it chooses to do so. If the Personality/Body choose to embrace the validity of a soul, then it can participate in an accelerated gaining of awareness that matches Essence's level of awareness at the time. It is a misnomer that this would be a "regaining" of consciousness, since this Body/Personalty would have never existed before, and therefore has nothing to regain. Personality/Body can gain, or evolve, in consciousness, either on its own, or at an accelerated pace when Essence is embraced. If the Body/Personality were not capable of doing this on its own, then progress for Essence would be made quite complicated, since Essence's evolution greatly depends on the experiences gathered and comprehended by Personality. Essence can evolve between lifetimes or within lifetimes, but if evolution were only possible between lives, and Personality was not capable of evolving on its own, then the concepts of Soul Age, Agreements, Karma, etc would have little relevance or consistency. As Essence evolves, so does its capacity for creating a Personality/Body that is more inclined to work well with the dynamic of Essence and the intentions of the lifetime, but this can never be guaranteed. At any Soul Age a Personality/Body can go "rogue," if you will, and this is not avoided. Some of the most fascinating experiences can be gained for Essence through a Personality that rejects Essence.

If one were to look for how one is doing in terms of levels of awareness/consciousness, Soul Age manifestation, and Body/Mind harmony, one of the clearest statements is in the way one eats. As long as one has a choice in the matter, then one's choice in diet reveals more about the level of consciousness, manifested soul age, and body/mind harmony than any other daily choice. This is because it is a choice that must be made daily, even multiple times a day, and a choice that must be made over and over by the Body/Personality is a choice that can reveal a great deal about consciousness. There are other choices that must be made every day, but eating is one that is universal if one is a Body/Personality, regardless of who you are, or where one is, or what one is doing. Eating is the single, most-immediately relevant form of nurturing one can do for the Body, and the focus of that nurturing is synonymous with one's level of consciousness, and by extension, can indicated one's Soul Age manifestation, and Body/Mind harmony (health).

We use the term "Mind" here to describe the cohesion of all components of Personality and its use of Chakras/Centers, which could be said to be the spectrum between False and True Personality. Since it is Personality who nurtures the Body, the degree to which one is False or True in Personality can easily be seen in how the Personality treats its own Body. It is not uncommon for there to be a skew between the Mind and Body, since it is rare to live only as True Personality, but the more habitually one is in False Personality, the less likely one would be nurturing to the self, and the more likely the state of the Body would reflect this in accidents, illness, or chronic conditions.

The spectrum of eating as it reflects consciousness is rather simple, and is consistent with what you might understand as relevant to Soul Ages. As with everything, there is a Positive and Negative end of the spectrum for each. In addition, each level can be healthy or unhealthy. The health of the Body includes the Physical, Emotional, and Intellectual bodies, so the more one is eating from the negative, the more likely those bodies are divided, in conflict, or out of balance.

The older one's Soul Age, the more levels will be recognizable below as having been a part of ones own life at various times. Keep in mind that these levels identified below as ranging from Infant to Old do not describe a progression of good to bad, healthy to unhealthy, anymore than Infant Soul Age is better than Old Soul Age. Within each level there are the polarities that can reflect the degree of Mind/Body harmony.

However, the greater the gap between the technical Soul Age and the manifested Soul Age, the more likely that gap reflects a lack of nurturing of the Body so that the Personality/Body, which affects awareness and consciousness. Also, the older the soul, the less static the spectrum below will be, and one might find oneself reflecting a nurturing of negativity on some instances, and a positive level of nurturing in others.

INFANT: Nurturing mainly through food
Positive: Eating to live
Negative: Living to eat

This could be likened to the constantly-foraging animal whose days or nights are spent simply in the search for food. If one is eating to live, or living to eat, one is probably working through Infant Levels of consciousness and Soul Age.

BABY: Nurturing mainly through familiarity
Positive: eating that honors nostalgia
Negative: eating that defends tradition

If one only eats what one has learned is acceptable and familiar, either for nostalgic or traditional reasons, then one is probably working through Baby Levels of consciousness and Soul Age.

YOUNG: Nurturing through satisfaction
Positive: eating for pleasure
Negative: eating to indulge

If one eats whatever one wants, mainly to satisfy oneself, either for pleasure, or for indulgence to fulfill addictions, cravings, habits, specialness, or image issues, regardless of consequence or impact beyond that personal satisfaction, then one is probably working through Young Levels of consciousness and Soul Age.

MATURE: Nurturing through empathy
Positive: eating to increase sensitivity
Negative: eating to display superior group alliance

If one eats with empathy, either through the sensitivity of impact and consequence of food choices on the Body and beyond the Body, or through the need to display superior group alliance, one is probably working through Mature Levels of consciousness and Soul Age. The planet is now entering into a general Mature level of nurturing that encourages empathy in both positive and negative ways.

OLD: Nurturing through adaptability
Positive: eating to increase holism
Negative: eating to resign

If one eats with the awareness that nurturing through food, familiarity, satisfaction, and empathy all play a part in the day-to-day diet, then one will do so through adaptability to the various nutritional needs and desires of the Body and Personality, either through the awareness that life, nostalgia, pleasure, and sensitivity all contribute to a global and local sum that is greater than all of its parts, so to speak, or through sedation of the Body and Personality as a means to resign from the overwhelm of considering the bigger picture that one knows one has glimpsed or has been exposed to.

If one is an Old Soul, then the ultimate form of nurturing, the greatest degree of harmony between the Body and Mind, the manifestation of Old Soul consciousness, would be found in the holistic diet. This simply means that one combines all of the positive poles in a way that each form of nurturing is supported as one needs or desires so as to contribute to an overall state of health and harmony for the Body that is now recognized as part of a larger body.  The key to an Old Soul's healthy diet is in his or her willingness to adapt to the variations of life that show up from scarcity to abundance, and still making the most conscious choice possible in that variation, knowing that all of those choices will add up.

If one is an Old Soul and has turned to resignation, this can show up as a combination of eating just to eat, a defense of food routines, a compulsion to challenge or condemn those whose diets are based in compassion and awareness, and a diminishing of the role Sentience plays in the dynamic care taking of life for the individual Body and its larger body.

End Transcript

   

Switch to our mobile site